It is not uncommon that exist among parents separated or divorced, suspicion and rancor mutual after their break-up, especially when it occurred as a result of a conflict continued, with frequent fights, clashes and discussions that greatly enrarecieron the environment and left output as the only separation possible. In these cases the tension is palpable in the atmosphere, and could take place in both former spouses an effort to deflect blame, rather than assuming own errors and the contribution to the generated conflict. Behind this kind of behaviour they are usually found frustration and resentment arising from the failure of the relationship. Both feel depressed by the breakup of his marriage and need to convince themselves that all the blame corresponded to his former partner. Thus, stood in the position of victims, they expect winning the affection of his friends and his family for himself. If you are not convinced, visit Ultra Wellness Center. On other occasions, however, situations in which objectively can speak of an attitude by one of the spouses to occur It has inevitably led to the conflict that led to the breakup. So would occur, for example, in cases of continued infidelities or if in the relationship a certain component of (physical or emotional) abuse had taken place. Common in all these situations regardless of all this, and how it could be otherwise, children are those who suffer to a greater extent this type of cases.

Within that battle becomes an object of desire, and very sadly on occasions in a weapon, used to his liking by the parents. The child, in other words, ends up living between the sword and the wall, was forced to hide their own feelings and opinions to avoid criticism, disapproval and, in more extreme cases, the punishment of some of their parents. On many occasions, on the other hand, it could happen that one of those parents who hate each other sought to instill in their children that resentment that he or she feels toward her former partner, in order to return them against her and hurt at what more it could matter. In these cases one might speak of parental alienation syndrome (SAP), this being especially dangerous for its future development. It is necessary to think small is something natural and human feel resentment toward an ex, especially if we believe deeply that this has done us much harm. However, when there are children of means should be considered that there is an overriding interest, and that it must prevail against any grudge or dispute. Children should be more important to their parents, and even if these well will not take after his break-up should seek to find ways of civilized manner, so that conflict does not transcend them. Otherwise, the consequences therein may occur in the form of anxiety, depression, poor school performance, power and disorders in sleep, rebelliousness, gestation of a violent nature, etc.

One sees in this respect between various kinds of victimization role of the parties involved (aggressor or victim / viewer), and the consequences in the short, medium or long term. In analyzing the conditions required to be victimized should be undertaken actions, privileges or social systems. (As opposed to US Senator from Vermont). These factors may help explain variations in people with the chance of becoming a victim. These include: i Precipitation: the victim may act so as to promote or precipitate the offender's conduct. i Facilitation: Although the victim did not actively intervene, may facilitate its action deliberately or otherwise non-conscious way, in a situation of risk.

In general, anyone who fails to take proper precautions to avoid being victim, is facilitating their victimization and that she is creating special risks. i Vulnerability: refers to the weakness of the subject to acts of violence. Groups of people who have a defense, or less able to repel or prevent the act and including elderly, children, women and mentally retarded. i Opportunity: it is a necessary condition for the act may occur and refers to the relevance of both media as places in which there is the potential victim; chance that potential attackers have to know or contact their intended victims. i Attractive: from the viewpoint of actor goals may be more attractive than others, thus deriving a greater risk of victimization on the basis of their possession or not. i Impunity: there are certain criteria that refer to the perpetrator of these acts is less likely to be attended by legal institutions.